

I'm still arguing with the way I want to draw it, and these pinups i'm currently pretty unhappy with. They're missing a couple of things i've figured out as "probably important in comics" lately, but are still much more in the vein of what I wanted for the book. I'm going to stop faffing around with style choices soon, mind you. I have a couple more characters to design, a couple more locations and then it's straight into test pages.
I feel like i'm getting there. Albeit bloody slowly...
~John~
8 comments:
Yay, bish dude! Sweet pinups man, I love the first one in particular! Great to see contrast between the busy buildings and the open white space. Would you be able to carry out a whole comic like this? That's worship-worthy!
Second one... really cool overall but I have minor nitpicks. My biggest issue is probably the eyes. The right eye looks higher than the left eye. Wonky eyes is something that I'm particularly sensitive about.
I have some thoughts about the composition as well, let me know if you want them. I don't want to say too much if you're not looking for crit. :)
Hrm Wonky eyes are my pet problem. I think in this case I actually screwed up his pupil too! The composition is also pretty iffy, I agree. I had something in mind for the background, but It didn't work so I left it out. Better to get these things wrong now, I guess. Cheers for the crits. Always welcome.
Awesome! I love the looser brush style going on, it frees up your figure drawing a lot. Wonky eyes didn't stick out to me, I think the quality of the drawing is good enough to carry a bit of wonk.
I must be honest though, the "liquid" text on that logo sticks out like a sore thumb to me. The shape of the text is great, but the gradient inside it is seriously 80s, and not in a good way.
Ahh, I'd actually really like to hear what you consider to be probably(?!) important in comics... will you write about it? :) I think these are awesome btw... quite Hiroki Mafuyu ^^
PS. Very happy to see a treasure trail! So often see drawn men totally lacking pubes of any sort and it's a SHAME. Bah!
Kate: yeah, once I do a drawing that demonstrates I actually understand what i'm talking about!
Paul: text is Very intentionally out-of-date 80's. I think it'll all become clear when you see the rest of the cast. It's shoulder-pads and eyeliner all the way. Perhaps it's actually not 80's enough, in that case, if the choice isn't obvious!
Maybe it's a personal taste thing. I got the overall theme I think, the logo is 80s in a good way, but the gradient is 80s in a bad way. Maybe I just hate clean gradients that much.
(cough) seconded.. get some sweet screen tones in there. ^_^
Firstly, totally love the awful-retro-80s logo. Perfectly sleazy and out of taste. Resist all impulses to make it cooler.
Secondly, the pin-up images look very different to what I've seen you do recently (have I missed a lot?) Perhaps you've been using a (pictorially) cleaner/rounder style for the DFC work?
This somehow looks a lot more detailed and textural - it reminds me of Henry Flint a little(I know you won't appreciate that comparisson, but... meh)
Keep it up, let me know,
Dave
Post a Comment